I'm reading right now about the drawing of figures (specifically in the context of icons, but the principles apply more broadly) in Aidan Hart's "Techniques of Icon and Wall Painting." His first principle he bases on the line from the Athanasian Creed: "Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance:" There is no unity without distinction, and no distinction without relationship. Although on the one hand this is obvious, on the other it really struck me! That's often how obvious things are, huh? Isn't this a statement so much more broadly applicable than in simply portraying a believable form? It's necessary in relationships: if you confound the persons, you end up codependent, unable to "think for yourself", and manipulated. If you divide the substance, you end up cruel and selfis
h. Healthy society requires individuals in relationship with each other. (And it's almost as though our two political parties have each selected a half to goof up! Liberals confound the person: "We're all the same! Everything's equal! Whatever I like is true - and so is whatever you like!" while conservatives divide the substance: "I've got mine, I don't owe you anything! Take the country back from the 'other' in our midst!" )
I've seen similar "faults" in music - although I wouldn't have thought to phrase it this way: People can become so concerned with not "confounding" the notes, that they totally "divide" the sense: All of a sudden you have a stulted series of pitches and syllables rather than a framework of melody carrying meaning.
His
second principle is to understand the form and allow the brush to
follow - which seems to only elaborate the first one. Again, in
singing, if you step back and see the entire line of text, the entire
line of melody, where it's going, and what it's doing, the details,
really, take care of themselves. If you look only at "1 & 2 e
& a" reading words perfunctorily while lunging after notes - you
don't get music! When playing tuba, one of my first breakthroughs was
when I realized (much like Professor Hill's "think method!") that
hearing the pitch I was about to play in my Mind's Ear was infinitely
more important that attempting to squeeze my lips right.
Later,
while describing hands, he states, "When deciding precisely where to
place each hand, keep in mind that whenever we create and place a form
we are also changing the shape of the space in which it is
placed...Also, like everything else in the icon, hands and arms need to
relate to the things near them..." Again, this flows from the first
principle, has universal applicability, and is particularly striking in
how often it is forgotten. A particular fault of a sort of Middle
Manager seems to be the inability to ever see a whole: While working at
Borders a regional manager came in and rearranged our displays in spite
of our protests - she goofed up necessary relationships in the space, changing it in ways that while good perhaps for "sales" were
manifestly bad for being a human being and getting to the check-out. It took watching several customers pile up and a wheel chair get wedged
before she conceded that our local staff might know something about the
space...
I
think this is also a part of what annoys me about a certain tendency
among what I will term the "liberal" (for want of a better term) side of
liturgical Christianity - they seem to have a particular weakness for
getting stuck in the ideas of their heads, rather than inhabiting their
physical space (even, and perhaps especially, while talking about "use
of space!") And so you end up with altars placed in odd places, weird
unforeseen emphases, awkward movements, bizarre proportions implying
importance and lack thereof of all manner of furniture and ornament, to
cater to a particular idea - but at the cost of "dividing the
substance." Organic development over time lead to chasubles suitable for
the task at hand; theory led to the replacement with chasubles that
are "too hot, so we won't wear them during the summer" and that knock
things over, drag hosts off the paten, etc. Organic development let to
altars being slightly raised to enhance line-of-site; theory moves the
altar nearer to the [front row] people, and thus hides it from any in
the middle-to-back.
Talk amongst yourselves.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)